Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Interesting, I went to the link they gave and to the safety section and it says:

> As of July 23, 2026, we have temporarily removed our safety analysis from this report, as well as relevant references to the analysis throughout the report (denoted in-text by a reference to this section). We were made aware of data discrepancies between City agency data for New York City for-hire vehicle crashes with serious injuries or deaths, as well as City agency data definitions related to such crashes. We are working to resolve these discrepancies and ensure our findings properly represent the data and the driving records of New York City for-hire vehicle drivers and Waymo vehicles. Other than this section, the remainder of our report remains unchanged.

My guess is jdlyga read this report before it was modified.



I think it’s not surprising that a report written by a forthrightly anti-car public interest group managed to screw that up:

https://www.openplans.org/who-we-are


I had never heard of them. But anybody can make a mistake and it shows integrity to immediately remove a section with a disclaimer when prevented with contrary evidence. Not enough folks do this.

You can have strong anti- "car-culture" views and still be committed to the truth.


Per the excellent Reddit thread linked below, if their analysis had been more thoughtful and careful, they likely would have concluded that Waymos are as safe or moreso than NYC yellow cabs.

Would they have published that result with the same fanfare?


Here is the report with the safety analysis: https://web.archive.org/web/20260722115526/https://static1.s...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: