It seems credible to me. There's a chance it's fake, but the idea that OpenAI agents might exploit a wiki that accepts edits via GET doesn't seem unrealistic given what happened with the Hugging Face incident.

The edit are there on these wikis (and others not mentioned on the post, but for example on wiki4d, the dlang wiki).

It's very difficult to argue for any fabrication meant to harm OpenAI when the traces are all over the internet if you look for them.

You can also go directly to the wikis and look them up in archive.org etc. Would be a very legally risky ARG to deface websites

Without being able to see the prompts, it is hard to make any assertions about honesty, we all know OpenAI is in trouble because they're showing ads already. And that is something that Sam has clearly marked as time of trouble for them.

The website is also looks just like a PR project. It is hard to believe anything.

This doesn’t seem to be the just releasd model:

https://x.com/peterwildeford/status/2092733480064954747