They simply shared their experience. I would’ve thought it’s a full-blown outage, but clearly not.

You stepped in the room real stinky here. What’s with the attitude?

No, they didn't "simply share their experience", they explicitly negated the scale of the issue in their opening statement, only because it works for them. So they claim "impact isn't too big" based on their personal anecdotal evidence of sample size literally 1.

> full-blown outage, but clearly not.

Again, based on a SINGLE report?

It was working for me too.

sample_size++;

I negated the cloudflare outage, providing source. Are you cloudflare so that you might be so affected by my statement?