Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Living through it doesn't save you from having a selective view due to only seeing a tiny, tiny portion of the country, or just rose-tinted glasses.

I've seen The Simpsons argument brought out a lot and it's weird to me. Homer isn't just a power plant worker, he's a nuclear safety technician, which pays quite well. Despite (somehow) having a really good job and a pretty moderate lifestyle (no childcare costs, modest and rare vacations, eating out infrequently, no fancy toys or extracurricular activities) and having substantial financial assistance in buying their house, the family is portrayed as financially struggling.

I'm not convinced about the usefulness of those numbers either. The figure for houses is probably useful. Used cars seem much less so. Modern cars last way longer. The average age of cars on the road today is almost double what it was then. The average price is going to be skewed upward by people with more money buying used cars that still have a ton of life left in them. Cheap used cars are still available and you probably get a much better car today even at the cheap end of the scale. For tuition, I'd like to see how financial aid changes the picture, since it seems like colleges these days engage in massive price discrimination by listing high tuition that few students actually pay in full.

Certainly some major things have become more expensive, but "there really wasn't such a thing as 'a job that doesn't pay enough to live on'" is way over the top.

 help



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: