Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> has explicitly cited the EU AI Act as the reason they introduced watermarking in the first place.

How they approach it, is on them. The EU AI Act just requires that whatever is AI Generated is marked as such under certain conditions.

> There's no such thing as metadata for a raw text output

Which is why you just have a paragraph saying that the content is AI Generated.

> How's that going to work for API calls?

Again, you are overthinking what the act is about.

It isn't that every API call requires to be flagged as AI.

It's the final output of the solution/application that has to be marked. Or the user is warned that what is created is AI generated.

It's to limit/prevent risks when AI generated content is used to make decisions that can negatively impact the public.



Your understanding of this is completely incorrect. You should browse the EU AI Act website more to see what's actually required and educate yourself.

Some further reading: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/code-pract...


Rather than refute, just hand waving. I guess we are done here.


Your level of reading comprehension is so incredibly low that it makes full sense why you can't see the difference between local models and the frontier models since you can't actually critically understand what you are reading anyways

The comment that you just replied to contained a link that directly refuted your claims but I think you probably failed to even read it or maybe even see the link?


> Your level of reading comprehension is so incredibly low

So attack the person, not the argument. Definitely done now.

> contained a link that directly refuted your claims

Two Courtier's Replies in one post.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: