Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This example is weirdly spelled:

    echo '{"k1": [{"k2": [9]}]}' | jq '.k1 | .[0] | .k2 | .[0]'
is equivalent to

    echo '{"k1": [{"k2": [9]}]}' | jq '.k1[0].k2[0]'

I kept waiting for the author to explain this, but they did not


It is a weird way to write it, I never use this notation for myself.

When teaching though, I'd rather make the it more visually explicit that jq commands are a sequence of filters. With the former notation, a | explicitly tells the reader that it's the end of one filter and the start of a new one, the latter is more implicit.


That's possible! I've never had to teach it, good point.


When I first started using jq, all of the examples I was following used the short-form. It took me a while to figure out how to use the functions and do some advanced transforms because of this. Since this article is Part 1 of a series I suspect the author will cover this in a later article.

From a teaching perspective it is probably best to start with the long-form.


good point, I hadn't considered that idea.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: