Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mantoto's commentslogin

That's just bullshit. You can check for how many uses a usbc plug was designed and tested for.


What they say is they have a charger in their pocket and connected to their phone while hiking. So they're like yanking the cable, sometimes slightly, sometimes harder, thousands of times per day, as they walk, climb, etc. I'd say put the thing in a backpack, or use wireless, or whatever...


I'd say it should be designed for being able to put a phone in your pocket while connected to a charger and engaging in sports. That sounds like a perfectly normal consumer-friendly feature, and consumers will do it anyway. Putting it in a backpack means you cannot easily look at it.

The solution is fairly simple -- the /housing/ around the plug needs to be standardized and have a snug fit into the housing of the phone. That would relieve strain on the connector or contact.

I really don't understand why people are downvoting me here. I thought downvoting was to deal with trolls and abusers. When did people start downvoting people they disagree with? That discourages meaningful discussion.


Didn't downvote, but I can see how you might come across as being disingenuous or trollish by saying it should be designed for a particular use case (which implies it isn't), observing that it doesn't work, and suggesting it be redesigned. Most people have learned that it's a bad idea to keep your phone in your pocket while charging, decide not to do that, and subsequently don't have this problem.



Well, they keep breaking on me and (a) DC barrel connectors (b) headphone jacks (c) XT30U (d) BNC (e) DB9 and a bunch of other connectors almost never break on me.


You're comparing a list of 2 pin connectors to an 18 pin connector.

Perhaps using wireless charging and putting a rubber band round your phone will be a better solution.


So apparently Mark Suckerburg reacted to it and 3000 other people.

Anyway he should probably go to Google for this. They look way more advanced than all others.

And not sure how much money he has but there should be ml involved and that costs a pretty penny


I would have said that the companies who would most benefit of this is also be the company who should not outsource this.


Yeah as long as gcp doesn't has a clear budget protection, I will not add my credit card to it as a private person.


Why would that be hard? Distributing a limited amount of static content around the world sounds reasonable easy to me.


Our subway is good. I'm using it every day and just because one train is canceled doesn't mean anything because 10 minutes later the next one comes


Agreed, I lived in Munich for 5 years and its public transport is excellent and very extensive, some of the best I've seen.


10 minutes? Good for you - I get pissed off if I have to wait more than 5 minutes between trains in London.


It's a user interface shift.

A smartphone is an complex always on device with its own internet connection, microphone, GPS and camera.

We are not trading low risk UI with high risk UI. We switch or extend it to nodevice/voice control.

And I personally find it very impressive and subtile.

It just makes sense to use it in your kitchen, bedroom or on the Couch.

It is the same with Philips hue. Do I need it? No. Is it worth to me? Every penny. Why? Because it's a completely new level. Now you can combine lamps which had not one switch like your ceiling lights with a standlamp in the corner and you put your ligjtswitches where you actually are using them.

That was never possible before.and it's great for creating lightsettings. I'm using different lightsettings constantly.

For example our light is much less bright when I go to the toilet at night and it is motion detection based which I really love for our floor.


You're talking about IoT in general; I was specifically talking about voice assistants


I was talking about voice assistant in it's current context.


There is always context and interpretation and what you think that the Autor ist missing is actually you who missed it.


Haha :)

Indeed!


That's just utterly wrong.

I have Alexa's and one Google home at home.

We now have cheap and good enough multiroom audio, voice controlled. It's used daily

We use very regular the weather forecast and timer and control our lights with it as well.

The future is here but it will probably go more in direction of offline assistance.

The integration in Philips hue, with more av receiver etc. Will just become even better.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: