This is a problem for the employer and for the selection and remuneration of staff (at all levels of the chain and not just those in contact with the customer)

I have the opposite experience with codex 5.3 I had to use 5.2 to design and 5.3-codex to execute , while 5.4 was a better in both, and 5.5 ( all used xhigh) is even better

Just because it's not important to pay attention to CVEs, why not waste the readers' time by creating "fictional" CVEs without a disclaimer in the first line? Just because it's not already difficult to scrape through the information and noise on this internet... especially if it appears on the front page of hackernews

Could one mistake this

> Status: Resolved (accidentally)

> Severity: Critical → Catastrophic → Somehow Fine

for a real CVE report?

Have you not read CVEs as of late? As a precondition for getting their funding back, all the doge boys get to write the CVEs for their own orgs. Insane parentheticals about trans people is the norm now.

next level NIST enrichment in action

The tag list at the top of the page includes “satire”.

I saw a comment very similar to this on a blog post testing the Copy Fail exploit, where someone was complaining that without a tl;dr at the top, it took too much effort for them to find out whether the blog post documented a new exploit. In fact, reading less than a paragraph already showed that couldn't be the case; the table of contents is enough.

If a glance at the CVE number that isn't a number doesn't do it, a minute or less of skimming this article likewise reveals it to be satire on a blog that's actually pretty thoughtful when it comes to supply chain attacks.

Idk how else to characterize this except as a literacy problem. Learn to skim. It should be unacceptable to characterize a few minutes of reading as unbearable toil. If your time is really so precious that (although you can surf Hacker News) you can't spare 1-3 minutes to read, surely you have someone else to whom to delegate the responsibility of watching for supply chain attacks.

Why am I seeing this crop up over and over?

There's one thing "the hackers" haven't considered, though! It's illegal to hack an app in the EU,

so the problem of bypassing age verification by hacking saved files doesn't arise at all!

/s

I assume it's also illegal as someone underage to access all the things protected by the age verification app. So we don't need the app then :-)

However, some one below 14 (at least in Germany) cannot be found guilty: sure the EU will fix that one with a legal act as well.

with those $2k you can have 2xB70, with 1.2Tb/sec and 64G Vram, on linux ( and you can scale further while mac prices increase are not linear 0

You're absolutely right. And these Intel GPUs will also be much faster in terms of actual math than the M series GPUs that the Apple setup would have.

I believe that as soon as nuclear fusion becomes operational (and perhaps AI could be of great help in this regard in the next 5 years),

all the carbon storage methods (efficient and otherwise) studied so far could be immediately put into action.

In addition to the immediate reduction in the use of fossil fuels for energy production, the scenario could be completely changed in 10 years, water could be desalinated, desertification reversed, etc.

Free and unlimited energy would be the solution to everything. The question is whether we will get there before it's too late... and perhaps AI is the answer?

> The question is whether we will get there before it's too late... and perhaps AI is the answer?

I won't touch "free and unlimited energy", but is there even evidence that AI produces more energy than it uses? Produces any at all?

Fission is good enough for this.

20 req/hour is 1 req every 3 min.. you have to think a bit and then write the requests..

imo , the main feature is /fast ... who use 1M context and for what? the model become dumber already at 200K.. it's better to manage the context , and since 5.3, codex is very good at managing it

I got this : https://www.svgviewer.dev/s/DNq3oGMB

pro with the 20$ subscription , from the gemini.google.com site , initially the request was routed to nano banana,

so I had to change the prompt and had to be very specific about not generating the image directly, here the exact prompt :

"I want the html svg code for that ( not the generated image) , generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle"

wonderful