there are still competitive market forces for co's post IPO

1. you can have luna clean up after itself and improve code 2. you might be doing something like video-editing, cad modeling, artistic direction, pcb routing, etc. that need to run a long time to "converge"

and to squeeze anthropic, and other research innovations, not just chinese models but those help bring price down

cost is dominated by non cached reads

that might depend on usecase, half of my cost is cache reads usally

It wasn't really used enough and it sat in an awkward middle space between luna and sol where either luna high/xhigh or sol med were better cost/perf wise

I don't agree. In "none" thinking mode, Terra serves a useful purpose where medium-grade intelligence is needed. Luna doesn't cut it.

Hardly enough time had passed to develop the data to come to a conclusion. Users can take time to build interest.

It's before and after following the arrow. 6 is the cheaper one.

then it should be GPT 5.6 Sol vs. GPT 6 Sol

Of course they'd charge more if they could... Of course they're pricing to outcompete their competitor...

HN discovers competition leads to lower prices

They also have postponed their IPO. So they don't have to be profitable that soon. Anthropic on the other hand plans to do the IPO this fall.

how would you even derive that conclusion from the headline/article?

so you fell for clickbait.

There are plenty of Jews that support Zionism and consider themselves Zionists that live in NY. You’re speaking from ignorance.

Great tech but the voice is like nails on a chalkboard to me

Which one? I like Eclipse