Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | andrewjneumann's commentslogin

Agree. It’s early stages, but I love the approach!


tl;dr right problem, wrong solution.


An essay exploring what happens to human society, economics, and purpose when self-improving AI and advanced robotics eliminate many physical and material constraints.

Happy to have a thoughtful conversation!


Have a bit of a contrarian view on this tl;dr don’t write code for human consumption if you use AI; BUT you have to accept AI coding lock in and change how you work.

Funny enough, discussed this yesterday

Stop Optimizing Code for Humans https://youtube.com/live/eLn4-XA-KdQ?feature=share


They keep writing like they stand to profit from this or something. Too many “coulds” in there for me too, this could be an amazing advancement and it could be nothing… normally we look at data and last headline I saw was 25 “high” vulnerabilities at the cost of $1 million in tokens.

No comparison to human teams, and I’m sure that $1 million in tokens was used by humans, in a team. So like most AI, they’ve developed a tool that capable people can use to be better, but unlike most tools, they’re claiming this to be outright magic. The magic is the hype train.


Google Enterprise accounts are sunsetting AI Ultra in favor of consumption based pricing at the end of the month. It’s unclear how limits for AI Ultra might change for gmail users. Flash3.5 is much better at coding, but also more expensive the pervious flash models.

So much for AI getting cheaper.


> So much for AI getting cheaper.

For now, that's DeepSeek: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing/ (they have a discount until the end of the month, even after that they will have pretty good prices)

Or GLM or Kimi, Mistral is also surprisingly passable. Or just have to open the wallet and give money to OpenAI or Anthropic for the subsidized tokens.

> Google Enterprise accounts are sunsetting AI Ultra in favor of consumption based pricing at the end of the month.

This whole thing feels a bit like what GitHub did with Copilot, though.


These are models that can be run locally BTW. Just get enough hardware for your throughput requirements, have it grind on multiple batches of tokens 24x7 to get reasonable utilization (keeping the cloud for time-sensitive uses) and that's it, no more rug pulls.


I don't even think the consumption based pricing is available for the IDE, only Antigravity 2.0, so they are basically killing the IDE.


It boggles the mind why people think AI will get cheaper when they're all selling tokens at a loss already.


It never ceases to amaze me how such poor management can exist, and how such a large company with people who depend on them can simply just not exist overnight. I only did they file for bankruptcy twice, they somehow completely ran out of money overnight?

Well, all the people who had future booked tickets get a refund?


Love to hear any ideas or questions!


Wanted to share some reflections on the surprise success of launching a paid OSS podcasting app on the Apple App Store. Happy to take questions and would love feedback!!


A premium podcast listening experience… with no ads, no tracking, and no subscription required. Full support for iOS/CarPlay/WatchOS including Podcast 2.0 features. Open source: https://yourpods.app/


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: