Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ImHereToVote's commentslogin

huh?

So hybrid attacks are incentivised for someone else besides Russia.

Enjoy it while it lasts. Neuralisee is more efficient so hyperscalers will use that soon.

Can you please elaborate? I hadn't found any sources and Google points to this post as the #1 use of "Neuralisee".

Switching the thinking from sampled coherent language tokens to raw logits not scored to correspond to any language.

In the research literature this is generally called coconut after the first paper published on the idea. It has advantages and disadvantages. I agree it’s more efficient. But the lack of observability and transferability are real downsides that block its adoption.

the point is it may be a feature. most providers don't want clients reading those and almost nobody provide thinking text anymore.

> almost nobody provide thinking text anymore.

Isn't the goal to be able to "debug" and identify alignment issues?


Exactly. This is how the Huggingface incident was reconstructed. But GPT-6 uses partially Neuralese, and its monitorability has dropped sharply according to benchmarks.

Another reason to switch off a central provider to open models as quickly as possible.

Correct spelling is "neuralese"

There is a computerphile video on this exact topic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuHddnIzKRA


They meant "neuralese".

GPT-6 already uses Neuralese / recurrent depth (reasoning in latent space) to some degree. Instead of emitting a reasoning token for every forward pass, they only emit a token every n forward passes. Eventually they probably won't emit reasoning tokens at all, except for tool calls.

I can't wait for such a system being deployed stateside.

If that's what it takes for Americans to start caring about the harm their military is inflicting on the world, sure.

In Rambo 2 (1985) it sort of was.

I believe its called the second amendment.

This would make deepfakes more expensive because you would have to tightly control the chroma and illuminance of the display.

Something a calibration tool surely can do I assume.

Fakes were always possible. Just labor intensive or costly.

I mean if you cite a copyrighted book verbatim. You are held liable. So should a company producing copyrighted work.

For instance a image/video generating model.


What if a toddler is browser HN and sees the curse word?

Oh, my, indeed! That's gonna traumatize the poor dude for life.

Like what? Any confirmed acts?


These acts are subterfuge by their nature so you're not going to get Putin coming on TV and saying "lol it was me".

"There is no proof at this stage to link the flying bomb directly to Russia, which denies any role. But as well as the means and the motive, Moscow does have form. The BBC has seen details of the investigation into a plot in 2024 in which Russian-linked proxies in Poland and Lithuania not only handled drones and explosives but also delivered them to Germany."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckgdmrxxkdxo


For retaliating against they president being assassinated and their country attacked. This is strictly against the rules based order.

It's not "their" president, Iranians didn't elect him. Khomeini was a religious extremist who only months ago presided over the murder of ten thousand protesters and we should shed not one tear.

He was elected by a so-called council of experts. Those experts are elected by the people, although screened by the council of constitutional guards. The council consists of six lawyers assigned by the leader and six lawyers elected by the parliament. (There's a parliament and a civil president.)

Iran is a republic. It became a republic in 1979 on a national referendum. Before that it was a monarchy. That monarchy used to be limited since 1941, but in 1953 it was restored as a result of an overthrow backed by US and Britain. The cause of that was that the civil government tried to nationalize oil companies. The last monarch is in exile but, apparently, hopes to return to power if the US wins.

The West is a fantastic liar and a tremendous used car salesman. There's a short story by Mark Twain how he tried to run for a governor. Satirical, but truthful. Yet somehow the West managed to sell the idea that a regular shitshow of this kind is a pinnacle of state development, that states who do not run it are, of course, oppressors and oppressed, and that any means against them are thus justified.


Why didn't they add honey traps to catch cheaters?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: